| You are a Social Moderate (56% permissive) and an... Economic Liberal (28% permissive) You are best described as a:
Link: The Politics Test |
For those who had labelled (or still are labelling) me a tyrant/dictator/totalitarian...eat your words! ;) HAH! This proves I'm not! :P
u can't put your entire faith in online tests dahling... ;)
ReplyDeleteyes, i know but i still feel vindicated... :)
ReplyDeleteaj: ditto that. haha.
ReplyDeleteerm...you know, when i clicked on that link, i saw this ad:
"sexsearch.com adult personals. millions of horny members looking for sex. find tons of sex partners in kuala lumpur. sign up today and get laid."
btw, my results show:
ReplyDeleteYou are a
Social Liberal
(65% permissive)
and an...
Economic Liberal
(30% permissive)
however, i have an issue with this statement:
"You are best described as a:
Democrat
You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness"
being a social constructivist, i don't believe in the existence of right and wrong, or good and bad, for these are constructed realities.
itulah...tak nak guna firefox & adblock...my browsing experience is ads-free! :P
ReplyDeleteermm, dahvid....can you clarify what you believe in then? i'm very confused... :P
my results also same like yours ah dave...
ReplyDeletei'm the odd one out... :(
ReplyDeletewhere got odd?
ReplyDeletenot same meh? 'democrat'
but the percentage differ i guess...
but then again, online test tak betul one...(but it's fun to do, no?)
yea, i guess the results must be taken with a pinch of salt... :P
ReplyDeleteohh...we all share the same wave length. i wanted to click on 'sexsearch.com' (did you see that aj?) but sked...(of spambots)
ReplyDeleteks: *ahem* (time for lecture. hehehe) well, to be honest, i'm in tune with socialism (not marxism in particular, but a bit of its elements). i'm particulary influenced by works written by the philosopher, michel foucault, who studied the discourse of 'madness'. in a nutshell, he argues that the notion of 'madness' is one that is constructed by those in power, and it is through such definitions that the distinctions between what the 'norm' and 'mad' are made. the same applies with 'good' and 'bad' as well as, 'normal' and 'adnormal'.
in short, it's simply this. i believe there's no such thing as 'good' and 'bad'. what may be good for you, may be bad for me. so, how do we quantify such labels? we just can't.
sekian, terima kasih.